So. My first blog. Thanks, Jack, for setting it up for me. I’ll try to use it regularly.
I thought I might base my first blog on one of the themes I will come to from time to time. I would like to promote a materialist view of existance among as many people as I can. I would strongly recomment the ‘Brights’ website. Daniel Dennett, an American philosopher, came up with the idea of giving materialists a title or a handle that would distinguish them from religious and spiritual people.
Homosexual people adopted the word ‘gay’ successfully so that it has become the word people use to describe their life-style. It’s a good word, happy and positive and it has fulfilled an important purpose in its new role. Daniel Dennett wanted to find a similar word that was equally positive that could be used by atheistic materialists, people who didn’t believe in ghosts, goblins or gods. ‘Brights’ seems a suitable word. The brights have a ‘network’ that now included tens of thousands of people all over the world. It doesn’t involve ‘joining’ anything, but it’s nice to think that this is a growing group. During the last national census it was reported that many people write ‘Jedi’ under the ‘religion’ heading. I would like to think that in the next census ‘Bright’ is an answer written in by large numbers of people.
April 18, 2007 at 8:48 am
Hi John,
Welcome to our world!
Hope you’re keeping well.
Mike.
April 18, 2007 at 2:25 pm
I believe, according to the criteria, that makes me half Bright – which I’m sure Jack would agree with given the amount of time it took me to figure out how to log in to here.
April 18, 2007 at 10:58 pm
Firstly, wotcher and welcome to the Big Bad Bloggy world. I’ve pointed a few people in your direction, so don’t be surprised if you get other comments.
Secondly, now you’re here, it’s probably time for an argument…
I note the materialist movement are feel that they have to resort to political framing to name themselves…
After all, who would want to define themselves as ‘dull’ or ‘dark’?
I’d have more sympathy for the movement if they would be prepared to use a neutral term, rather than have to use loaded terminology…
And I have no problem with much of the outlook of the Brights:
That’s fine by me. So long as you are prepared to be as tolerant of people who don’t have a naturalistic worldview.
If the Bright movement is willing to do this then it’s somewhat enlightened — and better than many of the ways in which religion is interpreted today. If it isn’t, then it’s just an atheistic fundamentalist organisation who insist that they are correct and sod everyone else – and I can’t approve of intolerance.